Sign Up

Have an account?

Sign In

Don't have account,

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account?

Please type your username.

Please type your E-Mail.

Please choose an appropriate title for the question so it can be answered easily.

Please choose the appropriate section so the question can be searched easily.

Please choose suitable Keywords Ex: question, poll.

Browse
Type the description thoroughly and in details.

Choose from here the video type.

Put Video ID here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sdUUx5FdySs Ex: "sdUUx5FdySs".

Sorry, you do not have permission to add post.

Need An Account,

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Search
Ask A Question
Home/1.15 What would the overall voltage gain of the cascade amplifier in Fig. 1.17 be without stage 3 (i.e., with the load resistance connected to the output of the second stage)? 81.8 V/V; a decrease by a factor of 9.

electricalstudent Latest Articles

1.15 What would the overall voltage gain of the cascade amplifier in Fig. 1.17 be without stage 3 (i.e., with the load resistance connected to the output of the second stage)? 81.8 V/V; a decrease by a factor of 9.

1.15 What would the overall voltage gain of the cascade amplifier in Fig. 1.17 be without stage 3 (i.e., with the load resistance connected to the output of the second stage)? 81.8 V/V; a decrease by a factor of 9.

1.15 What would the overall voltage gain of the cascade amplifier in Fig. 1.17 be without stage 3 (i.e., with the load resistance connected to the output of the second stage)? 81.8 V/V; a decrease by a factor of 9.

1.15 What would the overall voltage gain of the cascade amplifier in Fig. 1.17 be without stage 3 (i.e., with the load resistance connected to the output of the second stage)? 81.8 V/V; a decrease by a factor of 9.